Examination of Original Tools
Excavated from Federal Camps
By Paul A. Boccadoro

During the harsh winter of 1862-3, the Federal Army of the Potomac encamped just outside Fredericksburg and throughout the rest of Stafford County, Virginia. They built thousands of small log huts to endure the cold weather, and established an extensive military city that encompassed hundreds of acres of land.

When the army departed the camps in the spring of 1863, an immense amount of debris was left behind by Federal soldiers, including scores of commonly issued tools. Many of these relics were later excavated by 20th century historians seeking to document the camps and learn from the items left behind by Civil War troops.

This examination focuses on dug issued tools found in the sites of Federal camps in Stafford County, Virginia, and the intention is to allow the viewer to be able to identify the types, sizes, and styles of tools issued to Federal troops at least during 1862-3. While these tools do not represent every single style used during the Federal army, it does provide an excellent cross section of the major styles in use. These items reside in the collection at White Oak Museum in Falmouth, Virginia, and were made available for study by D.P. Newton. Additional information for this article was provided by forester Aaron Cook.

Part of the collection of excavated Federal issue tools at White Oak Museum, Falmouth, Va.
click for enlargements
AXES

Notice the two major styles of axe heads excavated from the camps: the simple wedge (top row) which resembles a later New England style that was adopted and began to be called by the name "Yankee" at the turn of the 20th century (USFS Axe Manual); and the wedge with the "axe lip" or "lug" (bottom row) which gives more wood to metal contact, and an extra steady and durable fitting of the handle into the eye of the axe head (Gränsfors Bruks). Among all the varying sizes of axe heads excavated, this represents a fair cross section of the range of sizes.

Some of the heads studied show use as wedge tool by having a severely battered butt (such as the head at top right). Some axe heads were found to have the upper toe of the bit angled upward (such as the head at bottom right). Note that the original lengths of all heads could have been originally longer, but from continuous sharpening they may have been shortened. The head at bottom left, dug from the camp of the 6th Maine, is the closest to it's original shape.

There was an absense of double-bit axes in the collection of excavated artifacts, and none have been seen in original photographs of Civil War troops. The double-bit axe was invented in Pennsylvania by William Mann around 1850. By 1860, the double-bit axe was very common in the Northeast, but it appears that government contracts did not purchase this type, at least according to available photographic evidence and dug originals. Because its popularity was generally limited to the Northeast, it is doubtful the design was used extensively, if at all, in the South.
.

     
     
HATCHETS
Again there seems to be two major style of hatchet heads: those of a wedge with additional handle support (top group) and those that appear more like small broad axes (bottom group). Some appear to have been used as wedge tools, as evident by having battered butt ends (such as the hatchet in the top group, top left). Only one hatchet head was found to have a US stamp, as detailed on the hatchet in the top group. One carpenter's hatchet head was found with the more hammer-like butt and a nail puller on the heel, as shown in the bottom group. This handy style and variations on it were definitely in use because they also occasionally appear in photographs. The handles are reproductions fitted onto the original heads for display purposes.
.
     
   
     
     
   
     
PICKS

Two styles of picks were among the several originals in the collection: those with flat bottoms (such as the head on the left) and those more crescent-shaped (such as the head in the center and on right). An additional difference between the styles is the width of chiseled end, used for cutting through roots, where it is wider on the flat bottomed pick and more narrow on the crescent-shaped picks.
.

     
SPADES

Contrary to belief, not all spade heads of the period were constructed of two sections of metal connected with five rivets. While this method of construction was in practice by some manufacturers (seen on the spade at bottom left), there were many being produced with simpler methods, as seen in the top three examples. All examples feature additional small plates on the top edge for pushing the spade into the ground with a foot, and all taper half an inch down to the tip. The necks of spades are generally more straight when compared to a more curving neck as seen on shovels. The handles are antique but not original to the heads, and are fitted onto the original heads for display purposes.
.

     
   
     
SHOVELS

Commonly known as an artillery shovel, the image on the left exhibits the five rivet construction seen on one of the spades above. Note how much more the neck curves for leverage than the spades. The center and right images show flat shovels, seen very often in original photographs, and contain no rivets although photos do show examples of this type of shovel with rivets. According to the White Oak Museum curator, other similar heads have been found in winter huts with the front flat edge bent upward. It is hypothesized these heads were from broken shovels and implemented as skillets for use inside the fireboxes, as the necks would have provided excellent handles. Of course, this would have only been seen in permanent camps, because the weight of the shovel head would have simply been too much to carry on the march.
.

     
ADDITIONAL TOOLS

Other tools such as these could have made their way into permanent camps. Only one mattock head was found, shown at left, and the broad axes could have been used for constructing huts or other buildings that required squared lumber. Broad axes may have been carried by Engineers, but it is doubtful they were used by standard troops or pioneers.
.

 

Bibliography

Gränsfors Bruks AB, (2008). The Axe Book. http://www.gransfors.com

Weisgerber, G. & Vachowski, B. (1999). An Axe To Grind: A Practical Axe Manual. Missoula, MT: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.